fnPrime


Study: Terrorism insurance inadequate



Significant gaps in the nation's terrorism insurance program could slow efforts to revive the economy after future attacks, according to a study.




Significant gaps in the nation's terrorism insurance program could slow efforts to revive the economy after future attacks, according to a study.

Many insurance policies protect against foreign terrorists, but don't cover losses caused by homegrown terror groups or even attacks involving chemical, biological, nuclear or radiological weapons, which are among America's top threats, a report by Rand Corp. finds.

Although scores of companies obtained coverage after a 2002 federal law freed up billions of dollars to help insurers pay claims, many businesses haven't bothered taking out policies. Terrorist coverage currently equals only half the amount of commercial assets protected by other insurance policies, said Bob Reville, co-author of the study by the California think tank.

Without insurance, a terrorist strike could heavily damage the economy because businesses would have trouble rebuilding and hiring again.

The Sept. 11 attacks hit insurance companies hard, costing them at least $32 billion in claims and prompting many to exclude terrorism from coverage.

Congress responded in 2002 by passing the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act to reimburse the insurance companies up to $100 billion should terrorists strike again.




Contact FacilitiesNet Editorial Staff »

  posted on 6/21/2005   Article Use Policy




Related Topics: