- Gen. Mngr. Fac. Mngmt. Oklahoma City »
- Asst. Vice President, Facilities & Operations »
- Facilities Manager »
- Director of Facilities »
- Building Engineer »
Controlling Ventilation Rates at University Research Laboratories
March 16, 2018 - HVAC
By Markus Schaufele
Laboratory buildings consume more than half of the total Northwestern University (NU) electricity demand, and a large part of this is for laboratory building ventilation systems. Over the past decade, NU has been installing a ventilation optimization system in laboratory rooms which dynamically controls ventilation rates to reduce energy use, provide a better indoor environment for occupants, and monitor space conditions along with occupant behavior.
NU has 15 science research buildings on two campuses. This space supports about $650 million in sponsored research activities. Approximately 5,000 NU researchers were registered to do wet bench research in NU laboratories in 2017, and a large number of undergraduate students rotated through the undergraduate teaching labs on the Evanston campus.
In 2016, the laboratory spaces consumed almost 118 million kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity, which, at a cost of $0.08/kWh, amounts to close to $10 million. This is about half of the total Northwestern University electricity demand. A large part of this electricity demand is made up of the laboratory building ventilation systems' electrical power needs.
Ventilation in the science laboratories and vivaria serves four main objectives: safe breathing air for occupants; suitable temperature and humidity for research activities; dilution and transport of equipment heat loads; and spot exhaust for vented enclosures, including cage racks for animals, and fume hoods or snorkels for chemistry.
Whereas a ventilation system designed for an office building may recirculate most of its air and only supply a small percentage of fresh air, architectural and building codes require that laboratory rooms and vivaria use only fresh outside air for ventilation. This design difference explains why laboratories require so much more energy to operate. A large amount of energy is required to supply, heat, cool, condition, filter, distribute, and exhaust this air in laboratory buildings.
The traditional laboratory design approach is to proactively ventilate all the time in anticipation of a chemical spill or release. This approach means exhausting the entire internal air volume of a typical laboratory into the atmosphere every 10 minutes. NU traditionally prescribed an air exchange rate for laboratories of 6.2 per hour. The currently designed air exchange rate for vivarium is 15 per hour. Since spill incidents and unsafe releases occur only rarely, laboratories are over-ventilated about 99 percent of the time. In the rare case of a spill or release, no extra clearance ventilation is provided.
New technologies implemented
In 2010, NU installed its first ventilation optimization system, supplied by Aircuity Inc., to monitor air quality related to use of a heat wheel - an energy recovery heat exchanger positioned within the supply and exhaust air streams of the air-handling system.
In 2011, NU committed more than $40 million as a part of the Northwestern Energy Retrofit Fund to pay for gas and energy conservation projects across its two campuses. This commitment to energy efficiency has decreased the amount of electricity purchased from the grid by almost five percent, even as the square footage of occupied space has increased.
In 2012, a large national energy services company implemented an energy conservation project for the Chicago campus research buildings, and a demand control optimization system was implemented on various lab floor remodels. In 2013, the NU facilities department began coordinating installations of the system at several Evanston campus science buildings, completing the installations in 2015 and 2016.
The ventilation optimization system monitors laboratory air quality parameters of total volatile organic compounds and particulates. Other laboratory and building control systems monitor occupancy via ceiling-mounted occupancy sensors. The information collected dynamically controls ventilation rates. The intelligent system adjusts the volume of laboratory air exhausted and respectively supplied within a specified range - usually between 2 and 12 air changes per hour. This dynamically controlled system provides the least amount of ventilation in an unoccupied lab (2 air changes). It can provide about twice the traditional ventilation rate in a detected release event (12 air changes).
As of Spring 2017, the ventilation optimization system had been installed in 130 laboratory rooms on the Evanston campus and 370 laboratory rooms on the Chicago campus. Each system includes a "sensor suite," built to accept a variety of sensors for multipoint sampling of the indoor environmental parameters. The sensor suite analyzes each air packet and sends smart signals to optimize ventilation. A total of 34 sensor suites were installed, with 2 more planned for a vivarium on the Evanston campus.
System offers transparent communication
Transparent communication with the laboratory users is important, since most of the sensors and control elements are hidden from view. Additional touch screens were installed in laboratories to provide feedback on current ventilation settings. Researcher adherence to operational limits is considered to be more important in laboratories where the air change rates can be below 4 ACH.
Capabilities and limitations of optimization system controls
The optimization system's sensor suite capabilities to measure carbon dioxide (CO2) and dewpoint are most interesting in non-laboratory applications. CO2 and dew point sensors are in used in some non-laboratory and vivarium settings.
For laboratory applications, the optical particle counter counts small particles (PM2.5) in one range: 0.3-2.5 microns. For vivarium applications, particles can be counted in two ranges: 0.3-0.5 microns and 0.5-2.5 microns. This feature can be useful to verify HEPA filter integrity on the supply side and efficiencies in clean space operations. The installed system commands the lab control system to dynamically increase the laboratory air changes above a particle count of 500,000 per cubic foot of air. This is accomplished by opening control valves in the ventilation ductwork of the affected space and may also affect the variable-frequency drive controls of the ventilation fans. The system calls for the highest air change rate at and above 5,000,000 particles per cubic foot.
For laboratories, the most useful capability is the sensing of total volatile organic compounds, either using a metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) or a photoionization detector (PID) calibrated to isobutylene. The PID can be calibrated to both ammonia and isobutylene. Once a sample air packet reaches the sensor suite, the response time is 30 seconds. According to the optimization system vendor, the MOS sensor provides complementary detection capabilities, as it will detect parameters (including but not limited to methanol, methane, nitromethane, and methylene chloride) that are either not sensed or only poorly sensed by the PID.
Exposure control and life safety considerations
The optimization system cannot take on life safety tasks or be used in lieu of a dedicated toxic, flammable, or oxygen depletion gas alarm systems. The system should only be deployed in low hazard laboratories. Maintaining a lab operational permit system with periodic checkups is advisable.
An air sampling pump sequentially delivers packets of air from each connected sensing tube to a centralized sensor suite. Depending on the array configuration, delay times up to the maximum allowed 15 minutes are possible. The PID used in the system uses a 10.6 eV bulb. Flammable gases or vapors with a higher ionization potential, for example, hydrogen, are invisible to the system.
A laboratory operations permit system should set threshold limits to the use of oxygen depleting agents. For example the hazards from spillage, dispensing, or use of liquid nitrogen have to be considered.
Energy savings evaluation
The optimization system used at NU reduces the general laboratory exhaust and respective fresh air inflow, but it does not regulate fume hood exhausts. Laboratories in which the number of fume hoods demands high exhaust ventilation will not realize energy savings. In equipment rooms where the equipment heat loads demand high ventilation rates for cooling, there is nothing to gain from the system. However, future laboratory equipment design conversion from air to liquid heat exchange may lead to additional energy saving opportunities in these spaces.
Chemistry teaching labs have a large number of fume hoods, but only limited daily or periodic use. At other times the fume hoods may be empty. Best design practice may be to manually turn all fume hoods exhaust on/off using a master switch. Investment in an optimization system may have limited payback in these areas, but could provide lab monitoring capabilities.
Since the system's particulate sensor only monitors two particle size bins, it usually is not used to dynamically control ISO Class 1-6 cleanroom ventilation rates. Currently, NU is investigating the use of the particle sensing technology for ISO Class 7 - 9 clean areas.
The best payback may be achieved in vivarium animal spaces. Animal releases of VOC and particulate into the secondary barrier (the room) will dynamically open ventilation valves for more fresh air. With directly ventilated cage racks this release is not frequent. We expect significant energy savings when the ventilation rate can be kept well below the traditional 15 air change design for vivaria.
Efforts to accurately quantify NU total laboratory energy savings are continuing. In addition, NU uses the data delivered through these ventilation optimization systems to diagnose air quality or temperature-related issues that may arise during laboratory operation.
Markus Schaufele, MS, CSP is manager of standards, compliance and emergency planning, office for research safety, Northwestern University.