4 FM quick reads on wireless
1. Facility Managers Have Multiple Reasons To Consider Wireless Building Automation Systems (BAS)
Today's tip from Building Operating Management comes from Gislene D. Weig of PlanNet Consulting: Facility managers have multiple reasons to select wireless building automation systems.
Wireless building automation system networks, simplistically speaking, are networks of electronic devices designed to monitor and control the mechanical, electrical, and lighting systems in a building. In a BAS network there are mainly three tiers or levels. Tier 1 (the top level — the primary bus) is where devices such as logic controllers, work station terminals, web-servers, and other supervisory devices are networked. Tier 2 (the secondary bus) connects to major mechanical, electrical, and plumbing components like the central plant controller, air volume box controller (VAV), boiler controller, and lighting controller. The third tier is where end devices like thermostats, lighting sensors and others sensors are located. The most common implementation for wireless BAS has been the sensor level (tier 3) due to the ease of installation, flexibility, and lower installed cost.
Wireless systems or hybrid (combination of wired and wireless) systems are worth considering under a variety of circumstances. Here are four cases where it is worthwhile for facility managers to consider a wireless or hybrid BAS:
- When there is a desire or requirement to implement BAS networks in new, existing or retrofit buildings where wiring is a challenge.
- If adding more sensors and actuators throughout a building can further improve the comfort of occupants while reducing energy consumption.
- When wiring is either aesthetically undesirable or cost prohibitive (e.g., historical buildings).
- When there is a need to increase flexibility. Without a need to re-wire, tasks like re-locating or adding thermostats and sensors throughout a space becomes extremely easy, with a minimum of disruption to tenants.
This has been a Building Operating Management Tip of the Day.
Controls Offer Further Lighting Efficiency
Today's tip is to look at lighting controls for further energy savings after switching to more efficient light sources. Once efficient fixtures and lamps have been chosen, there are really only two ways to further reduce energy use: Reduce burn hours or reduce light output. To perform either of those functions, you need a lighting control.
Commercialization of several novel technologies has expanded ways to apply controls to both existing and new installations. Competition and standardization in wireless communications protocols, for example, now provide options that avoid the usually costly installation of separate control wiring, often a deal-killer when adding controls to existing lighting.
Wireless switching can use power generated by one's finger (when pushing the on-off button) to send a radio signal from the switch to a relay built into (or added to) fixtures in the same room.
Wireless stations, when directed by a control panel, send signals to receivers that control whole circuits of fixtures, or to groups of fixtures based on electronic addresses built into their ballasts.
Reliable power-line carrier control products, using panels and dimming ballasts (either step or continuous), have expanded and become cheaper, offering a third way to retrofit without requiring additional wiring.
These options are competing with the now-standard Digital Addressable Lighting Interface systems that use dedicated low-voltage wiring to control individual fixtures. DALI is often installed in new or heavily renovated facilities while ceilings are open and spaces are unoccupied. Wireless systems are often applied where spaces are already in use.
Integrate newest technology into BAS
Today's tip comes from Douglas Yon, Project Manager, Facility Engineering Associates. The newest BAS technology updates involve opening up control protocols, integration of intelligent and layered internet dashboard interfaces, cloud-hosted technologies, and wireless networks.
Some of the integration programs offer platform intelligence in conjunction with the existing building automation system, overseeing the activities of large single or multiple heating and/or cooling plants. Most of these systems are demand-oriented and follow pre-programmed performance and demand criteria. Other platforms operate purely as dashboards providing performance data, communication with remote sites, and offering limited master controls for multi-building sites.
Cloud-based building operations and efficiency programs provide an opportunity for facility managers to access to applications and data storage at hosted, third-party locations and not on end-user hardware.
Internet dashboard interfaces and cloud integration have provided new ways to connect with other building systems through the building automation system by facilitating the exchange and collection of BAS data. This connectivity allows building managers and operators to access, monitor, and control building systems. From a building automation system dashboard, potentially any number of buildings and systems, regardless of automation system sophistication, can be represented and accessed.
The most important way a building automation system can contribute to performance is through system optimization, in a way that is consistent with the established performance parameters. This is followed by monitoring the building systems, providing timely and accurate data, and critical alarms to the building operator or facility manager. Along a similar line would be using the building automation system for continuous commissioning.
Wireless Option for Building Management System Has Pros and Cons
Today's tip from Building Operating Management comes from Josh Thompson, of Point Source, LLC: Be familiar with both the pros and cons of wireless building management systems.
- Most BMS systems now afford integration with wireless solutions. Those that are not "native" to a certain technology can be translated with gateways that are readily available and affordable.
- Wireless devices allow BMS devices access to challenging and hazardous spaces, including historic/renovation spaces where cables simply cannot be used.
- Because there is no need to re-route cabling, there is flexibility in design and facility re-purposes.
- In deployment, wireless solutions are often less expensive than hardwired alternatives, particularly when the cost of conduit and copper are factored.
- Wireless systems are electrically isolated, making them immune to lightning or other electrical damage.
- When properly configured, wireless systems are more secure than a wired equivalent, both in terms of data security and protection from physical damage to infrastructures/cabling.
But beyond those benefits, there are other factors that must also be considered.
- Wireless solutions require frequency planning coordination and potential IT coordination in design and integration.
- The bandwidth of a wireless system is limited when compared to wired equivalents.
- All wireless systems are subject to random interference, with no protection from future encroachment due to an unregulated spectrum.
- Wireless solutions should never be deployed as part of a life-safety system.
- Many require a consumable power source (batteries) which requires maintenance (at a cost) or line power, which defeats the benefit of using a wireless device; however, EnOcean devices do not require batteries. If you can get power to a location, you can generally get a signal wire there.
- Not all spaces are accessible or are shielded from radio frequency transmission.
- Many sensitive spaces and government facilities do not allow RF radiation of any kind.
This has been a Building Operating Management Tip of the Day. Thanks for listening.